Hmmm isn’t a lower Peter count better? From what I understand, OpenClaw is a mess, and it kind of shows from the commits. Pull requests with 1500+ commits, only reviewed by bots, etc.
Or perhaps this is what the “roast” part of the repo refers to.
Regardless, he seems to be a quantity over quality person
I thought this has something to do with the Peter Principle.
Both can be true.
I was wondering who this was. figured out eventually it's the author of Openclaw
Good r&d isn't public
... Like the University system, the national labs, NASA, ...
What are you talking about?
probably looking at apple...
Article does not explain what Peter unit is. Title is misleading.
It does, it’s the commit velocity.
Can we not post clickbait to HN? My fault for clicking, I guess. An informative title would be e.g. "Compare your organization's Github productivity to @steipete."
would be nice to know what's microsoft's peter units including all intenral source code as well.
oh great more memes about that data security catastrophe