• zorobo 3 hours ago

Would a satellite positioned at Earth Moon L2 be stable enough? It would also need a relay to communicate with earth…

• ericbarrett 3 minutes ago

It takes a bit of stationkeeping to stay at L2; like keeping a ball at the top of a low, smooth hill - needs a nudge every now and then. More than a circular Moon orbit if you pick your inclination correctly (the Moon is lumpy and not every orbit is stable; look up "frozen orbits").

• cozzyd 5 hours ago

RFSoCs seem like extreme overkill for this frequency range, though since Xiphos makes a space-grade one, it's not so unreasonable I guess.

Alas, I'm working on a competing project that I won't go into detail about :).

• vincent-manis 9 hours ago

s/dark side/far side/

• NitpickLawyer 6 hours ago

You're generally correct, but in this particular instance it does actually make sense to call it the dark side. Dark, as in "quiet" from RF interference. Just like some areas on Earth, near radio observatories, are declared "dark" (i.e. everyone tries to avoid using high RF emitting stuff in these regions, even comms satellites avoid it).

• defrost 6 hours ago

> even comms satellites avoid it.

If only ... Starlink is nominally "off' over the RQZ in W.Australia, but still leaking interference from not fully shielded electronics.

Starlink Coverage holes (3 years ago) - https://old.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/ymm6rv/starlink_c...

(July 2025) Starlink satellites disrupting astronomy research in WA's Murchison, study finds - https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-25/starlink-satellites-d...

• subarctic 5 hours ago

Dark side of the moon = the side opposite the sun, doesn't change here

• sigio an hour ago

It's only facing away from earth, it can face the sun just fine. Rotation is every 4 weeks.