A third way of using Linux (hisvirusness.com)
12 points by speckx 2 hours ago | 14 comments

• skybrian 2 minutes ago

Other ways I often use:

- Using a web browser to connect to a web app running in a Linux VM. I write all my custom tools that way.

- Using VS Code to connect remotely, using ssh

• __MatrixMan__ 21 minutes ago

I stick to CLI's and TUI's and use zellij as my window manager. This way the configs and muscle memory I develop on my work macbook are transferrable to the linux box I use for personal projects, and visa versa.

It seemed a bit limiting at first, but after adapting to it I feel like it was the right move. GUI's represent a sort of explosion in the set of valid states for software to be in, and I find that software which opts out of trying to support that explosion tends to work better, likely because the maintainer just has less to worry about.

• floathub 44 minutes ago

Emacs text interface, Emacs GUI interface, and ... sorry what's the third one? :-)

• iron-s 40 minutes ago

ghostty running ssh w/ emacsclient connected to emacs daemon running ghostel

• spottedmarley 11 minutes ago

I was hoping the third way would be somehow related to a type of hands-free neuralink so I can code at the speed of thought with my eyes closed laying in bed. Someday the tech will exist but, by then I'm not sure coding will be a thing to do anymore. I'll probably still do it anyway though.

• horsh1 31 minutes ago

Well, if we count claude as tui.

• GianFabien an hour ago

Early Reuters and Bloomberg terminals had a text-centric aesthetic.

AFAIK on a PC, when booted into text-only mode, you are still using a bit-mapped framebuffer. From my experiments you can mix graphics and text.

• BirAdam 26 minutes ago

Isn’t that what resolution aware ttys and screen accomplish?

• hypfer 43 minutes ago

Ah yes, website talks about "the bloat of x11 and Wayland", and doesn't even scroll correctly on Firefox mobile likely due to some JavaScript fuckery.

Practice what you preach. And practice first.

• seba_dos1 18 minutes ago

Not JavaScript in this case, just CSS bloat (backdrop-filter).

• orangea 26 minutes ago

I don't see any suspicious JS on the page, so I suspect it's a styling issue triggering some inefficiency in Firefox. There are animations and text-shadows.

• dormo 40 minutes ago

Scrolling is pretty bad on Firefox desktop as well. So bad that I didn't want to finish the article.

Why do people do this?

• thereisno 15 minutes ago

They only tested in Chrome.

• allanrbo 37 minutes ago

Like the days of Norton Commander